Re: Fedora 16 beta vice Knoppix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 04.10.11 21:01, JB (jb.1234abcd@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Results interpretation.
> > -----------------------
> > Knoppix won by a wide margin, while:
> > - Knoppix having microknoppix fast-parallel boot (based on SysV/LSB scripts)
> >   and DE with low resources usage and tailored for desktops
> 
> > - Fedora having systemd parallel boot and DE tailored for small and simple
> >   devices

>    ^^^^^ huh? Fedora is not tailored for that. Would be great of it it
>    was, but that's simply not the case.

> We install LVM and iSCSI and all kinds of other enterprisey stuff
> on even the smallest netbook. [...]

This is a great writeup. Why don't you add it to your "systemd for
sysadmins" series? And/or some page on boot speedup in the Fedora wiki?

Thanks for the pointers!
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux