On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:38:18PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>> XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all. > >> > >> the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system that > >> should have to run on 32 bit:-( > > > > 32-bit machines have a 32-bit index into the page cache; on x86, that limits > > us to 16T for XFS, as well. So 32-bit is really not that interesting for > > large filesystem use. > > > > If you need really scalable filesystems, I'd suggest a 64-bit machine. > > i mean if you support xfs and think it's better then ext4 why not > support it on rhel 32bit? This is a question you should direct through Red Hat's support channels. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
