On 10/04/2011 01:03 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 10/3/11 5:53 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On 10/04/2011 12:33 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>>> I wasn't able to give the VM enough memory to make this succeed. I've >>>> only got 8G on this laptop. Should I need large amounts of memory to >>>> create these filesystems? >>>> >>>> At 100T it doesn't run out of memory, but the man behind the curtain >>>> starts to show. The underlying qcow2 file grows to several gigs and I >>>> had to kill it. I need to play with the lazy init features of ext4. >>>> >>>> Rich. >>>> >>> >>> Bleah. Care to use xfs? ;) >> >> why we've to use xfs? really? nobody really use large fs on linux? or >> nobody really use rhel? why not the e2fsprogs has too much upstream >> support? with 2-3TB disk the 16TB fs limit is really funny...or not so >> funny:-( > > XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all. the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system that should have to run on 32 bit:-( -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
