On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all. >> >> the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system that >> should have to run on 32 bit:-( > > 32-bit machines have a 32-bit index into the page cache; on x86, that limits > us to 16T for XFS, as well. So 32-bit is really not that interesting for > large filesystem use. > > If you need really scalable filesystems, I'd suggest a 64-bit machine. i mean if you support xfs and think it's better then ext4 why not support it on rhel 32bit? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
