On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:32:18AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200 > Gregor Tätzner <gregor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this > > discussion? > > No one has officially asked fesco... > > Please file a ticket what you actually want to ask fesco here? > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newtplticket It's a Fedora Packaging issue, and it was discussed a long time ago: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg01229.html The point I wanted to raise is whether we should revisit this issue and if we can package unison better. > I'm not sure how we could better setup the packages... whats the actual > proposal here? All of the versions in one package is not a good > solution, IMHO. Agreed. But going through a new package process every time upstream releases a new version is also not great. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
