Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 11:15:54 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213 > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227 > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison > > > > > > Instead of introducing yet another variation, can we somehow create a > > > single 'unison' package which covers all of the protocol variants? > > > > Why should I install all versions if I only want the recent one? > > Or the xxx one, for compatibility. > > > > Isn't there a general policy "split into many rpms, when possible"? > > > > Having a single executable would be great (like rsync), but that > > is an upstream issue. > > They don't all need to be in separately named packages. It's not > beyond the realm of possibility for us to package up multiple versions > of the source into one unison package. > > TBH I'd like to hear what FESCO have to say about this, because AFAIK > there is no other package in the whole of Fedora which is packaged > this way. > > Rich. Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this discussion? Regards, Greg -- Your nature demands love and your happiness depends on it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
