Re: unison formal review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200
Gregor Tätzner <gregor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this
> discussion?

No one has officially asked fesco... 

Please file a ticket what you actually want to ask fesco here?

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newtplticket

Personally, I think that barring upstream waking up and deciding to
support different versions being able to talk to each other, we are
setup the best we can. 

I'm not sure how we could better setup the packages... whats the actual
proposal here? All of the versions in one package is not a good
solution, IMHO. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux