On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 14:05 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:27:35AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > Sigh. I was joking. Obviously, if maintainers went around inserting > > Conflicts with other packages because they don't like how the other > > package works, then there'd be an order of magnitude more unpleasantness > > on fedora-devel. > > The grub maintainer is telling you that the way in which you're trying > to use grub is broken. You *need* to use the grub files that are in > guest, not the host. This will be even more true with grub 2. It's not a > matter of disliking the approach, it's a matter of it being demonstrably > technically incorrect. There's nothing technically incorrect about the approach, demonstrably or otherwise, if the version of grub in the guest and host is compatible. Cheers, Mark. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
