On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:21 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 9/20/11 11:43 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > >> Of course, the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups, five years > >> later, so provenpackager is the big hammer we have. We could get groups > >> any day now, that'd be just fine. > > > > Do you mean "groups of groups", like in "provenpackager-kde", > > "provenpackager-gnome", and "provenpackager" means all of these? > > I don't see any real reason to do that instead of just unix-style > groups, but either one would be an improvement. Hmm, it seems I don't quite get what you mean with "the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups" -- while provenpackager among others is a group. Would you please elaborate? TIA, Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nils@xxxxxxxxxx nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
