On 9/20/11 9:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> Currently >> I only see mails of maintainers who plan updating the library, but the >> rest of it pretty much depends on the maintainers of the depending >> components rebuilding them quickly enough, and the original maintainer >> to include them in the F-16 branched update. >> >> I'd like to see a discussion about how we can ensure -- within >> reasonable limits -- that e.g. bumping a library's SONAME is followed by >> dependent components being rebuilt and included with the providing >> component in one update. > > I'd like to see a discussion on the proceedures currently being applied > by QA, esp. "during freezes". IMO, they are unsuitable and harmful. I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into the OS so close to a release. In the absence of a very good motivation, that's not good engineering practice, and it's not consistent with the feature process. Perhaps you're not clear on what the word "freeze" means. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
