On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:52:28PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 09/20/2011 04:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >What the maintainers could have done is not upload a package that breaks > >binary compatibility into a distribution that's attempting to stabalise > >for release. > > That's a way too simplistic view - It's simply that other processes > (upstream release cycles, upstream release processes, package > maintainer's time slots, etc.) are not in sync with Fedora's cycles > and that Fedora's wanna-be QA's delay slots are severely adding to > the already existing problems. You're not obliged to upload the latest upstream. It's very practical to simply not do so. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
