On 16 September 2011 20:46, Jef Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Are you sure you didn't cut it down so much that you are hiding problems >> that your depsolving rules don't solve well? Did you throw out someone's >> baby with all that bathwater? Perhaps I did; the tests were made intentionally simple. > If I wanted to run the same transaction tests under current yum using your > cutdown repodata directory and point yum to it? Sure, I guess you could write some python for that. I'm not really a python dude. > I'm assuming you've done this already. are there particular test > transactions where yum comes up with a different solution than zif using > your cutdown repodata that you would like to draw my attention to? No, I've not, but I would be very surprised if those simple transaction results differed. The way the results would differ is if you setup a fake repo that's intentionally broken, and switched on skip_broken. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
