On 09/15/2011 02:07 AM, drago01 wrote:
<snip>On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 09/14/2011 06:23 PM, drago01 wrote:On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ralf Corsepius<rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Is there a reason Fedora "starts a bunch of stuff that pretty much nobodyAnyway, some more figures: On the same machine, bootup times when booting from a (slow) external (IDE) USB2 HD: - Fedora 15/i386: ca. 135 secs. - Ubuntu 11.04/i386: ca. 70 secs. [Here bootup time: Wirst watch measured time from "grub prompt" to "login screen"] It shows the effect of slow disks (60secs w/ internal HD vs. 2.15 minutes w/ USB HD), but raises questions on why Ubuntu appears to be so much faster in this configuration.Do they both start the same services? Unless you "tweaked" your fedora installation where we start a bunch of stuff that pretty much nobody would use in a typical desktop system that is to be expected. would use in a typical desktop system" ? Fedora is certainly not targeted at the server/enterprise target, being on the bleeding edge and all. --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
