Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 17:56 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> 
> > > If there is 
> > > not enough karma for his package to bring it into the stable, then there 
> > > is probably time to ask somebody (probably on fedora-devel), to test 
> > > this package.
> > 
> > We have a default of +3 karma for automatic pushes to stable, so a +1
> > from the maintainer by itself isn't enough to push an update to stable
> > already. 
> 
> That's only a default, though; you can lower it to 1 when you submit the
> update. Also, once a critpath update hits the required threshold - +1
> from a proventester, +1 from anyone else (PT or no) - you can manually
> push it to stable, whatever auto-push threshold you set.

Well, I never really understood why we're able to lower the stable karma
threshold. To me that's much more "gaming the system" than a maintainer
+1ing his update after testing it (with the default threshold).

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux