On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 20:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 09/10/2011 12:15 PM, drago01 wrote: > > Well it seems upstream isn't really interested in fixing this so if we > > want chromium in fedora we'd have to ask FESCo for an exception. > > I agree with that. If Spot is going to maintain it anyway, it might as > well as be in the repository and more accessible to end users with > better security I disagree. It being in the repository rather implies that it meets Fedora's packaging standards, which it very clearly and egregiously does not. Being in a third party repo makes it clear that it does not. Given that it's not a particularly vital package, since we have the somewhat more 'correct' Firefox, I don't think it's necessary to suspend our packaging standards to accept this kind of crappy code into Fedora. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
