On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 09/12/2011 04:03 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > I haven't read the whole thread, but I also feel the rate of AutoQA development is slow. Unfortunately I don't know how to improve that, since there are just a few people working on it and they are also participating in release validation testing, test days and other QA activities. > > I am thankful for what AutoQA has already been able to accomplish. It > has caught quite a few dependency breakages already and while I would > like to see more (automatically unpush packages, block packages which > have such breakages etc), it does serve a useful purpose now. What > would be useful is more visibility into the roadmap and timeline. AutoQA's a very transparent project, if you subscribe to the autoqa-devel mailing list. They do all their goal-setting on that list and in occasional public IRC meetings. For e.g., here's the discussion about what to do in 0.7: https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2011-August/002751.html all the work on AutoQA is tracked in trac, and the tickets are associated with appropriate milestones, so you can go to: https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/report/3 (active tickets by milestone) to see all the concrete things planned for AutoQA, and get an idea of their current prioritization. (and get a feel for all the stuff that still needs doing...) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
