On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:37 AM, John5342 <john5342@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben >> <christoph.frieben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": >>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to >>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit >>>> files and shipping them. >>>> >>>> Your work did not go unoticed! >>> >>> I do agree in particular with respect to his labour to provide cromium >>> packages to the Fedora community. However, there is always some margin >>> to improve: would it be possible to actually sign the chromium builds >>> somehow? ~C >> >> What would be more productive (in the long term at least) is figuring >> out what the blockers are to getting Chromium into Fedora itself and >> getting those fixed, rather than as an external repo. That way >> packages would be signed as a part of the normal update process. >> >> I've never looked at the source or the packages myself so I can't say >> anything more - the packages do work fantastically though and I >> appreciate all the work Tom has done on them! > > This is an old blog post but having seen upstream i am sure it still > very much applies: > > http://spot.livejournal.com/312320.html Well it seems upstream isn't really interested in fixing this so if we want chromium in fedora we'd have to ask FESCo for an exception. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
