On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > > minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that > > maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, > > this seems to be happening - exhibit a): > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-7.fc16 > > > > karma is listed as 1, the only positive feedback shown as I write this > > is from kengert, who submitted the update. > > > > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / > > case-by-case enforcement of this policy? > > sometimes a +1 after weeks in testing is the only or at least easy way to > nudge a package into stable. > > e.g: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc15 > even with my +1 still not there, and this isn't the only package I've done > this for. Please don't turn this into another 'I'm not getting enough testing on my old critpath package' thread. We already have about five of those, plus a trac ticket. Whether it has some practical effect or not, it's clearly against the current policy, and what I'm questioning is whether Bodhi should be enforcing that policy automatically. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
