On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:09:03PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > >> minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that > >> maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, > >> this seems to be happening - exhibit a): > >> > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-7.fc16 > >> > >> karma is listed as 1, the only positive feedback shown as I write this > >> is from kengert, who submitted the update. > >> > >> Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / > >> case-by-case enforcement of this policy? > > > > sometimes a +1 after weeks in testing is the only or at least easy way to > > nudge a package into stable. > > > > e.g: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc15 > > even with my +1 still not there, and this isn't the only package I've done > > this for. > > Do you mean if you don't want to wait for a week in testing? Or is > you're package not aging out for some reason? I do it once the old_testing emails start getting too annoying. With the exception of evtest, I think all the packages I own are critical path so even after that timeout I can't push without proventester ack. in a few cases, I had provenpackager +1 but no other tester and we seem to need both (?) to get it to stable. Cheers, Peter > I own several (new) packages that are not really used yet (building > blocks for other packages) and I didn't feel right about +1 my own > packages so I just end up leaving them in testing until they can be > pushed to stable... > > Richard -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
