On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:38:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > > > minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that > > > maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, > > > this seems to be happening - exhibit a): > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-7.fc16 > > > > > > karma is listed as 1, the only positive feedback shown as I write this > > > is from kengert, who submitted the update. > > > > > > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / > > > case-by-case enforcement of this policy? > > > > sometimes a +1 after weeks in testing is the only or at least easy way to > > nudge a package into stable. > > > > e.g: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc15 > > even with my +1 still not there, and this isn't the only package I've done > > this for. > > Please don't turn this into another 'I'm not getting enough testing on > my old critpath package' thread. We already have about five of those, that wasn't my intent. > plus a trac ticket. Whether it has some practical effect or not, it's > clearly against the current policy, and what I'm questioning is whether > Bodhi should be enforcing that policy automatically. my argument is that even though it's against official policy, it can be useful in some cases. The current voluntary compliance is imo a good solution since it can be circumvented when needed. I'm definitely not advocating doing this for every update. Cheers, Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
