On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 22:28 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:20:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Is there a specific reason glibc does this? > > Yes. > > > Can it not have a set of patches, one per change, as is usual practice? > > Fedora glibc sources are from git, and the bit diff is just generated > diff between the upstream snapshot and corresponding Fedora snapshot, > sans a few Fedora-only directories (which are packaged as extra tarball). Jakub I guess this would be some more work but why don't you just use git format-patch to get all the patches for the commits between the baseline and the top of the tree ? That would give you a set of discrete patches that mirror the commits you have in the git tree. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
