On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:15:38 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 22.08.2011 23:01, schrieb Tom Callaway: > > On 08/22/2011 04:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> I'd vote for simply making this an implementation detail of the > >> package. I.e. if a package gets the permission to enable its > >> service by default it's up to it whether it wants to be started at > >> boot or via socket actviation of via any other kind of activation. > > > > Sure, assuming that FESCo agrees that packages starting by default > > is the same as socket-enabled start on-demand. > > this argumentation is strange and makes no sense I think you are confused as to what 'by default' means. It means: when you install this package on your Fedora system, will it start automatically on next boot or not. Thats all. You as end user can disable it, enable it, or do whatever you like with it. Thats your choice. This default is simply talking about what state it's in when first installed. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
