On 08/22/2011 01:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I'm pretty sure that we kicked this up to FESCo and they decided to treat > them the same (although the latter may not have come to a formal vote and > only been discussed during their IRC meetings on the overall subject.) Going > back to the quote in this message, though, that was a result of discussions > with Lennart rather than FESCo. Sure. I just want FESCo to either decide that socket-activated services == the same as default enabled services, or that there is some sort of separate whitelisting for socket-activated services. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
