On 08/22/2011 04:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > I'd vote for simply making this an implementation detail of the > package. I.e. if a package gets the permission to enable its service by > default it's up to it whether it wants to be started at boot or via > socket actviation of via any other kind of activation. Sure, assuming that FESCo agrees that packages starting by default is the same as socket-enabled start on-demand. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
