Am 22.08.2011 16:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla: > >> >> Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >>> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in >>> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the >>> above? >>> For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greatest to every >>> release is good. I might agree in most cases. But for something like >>> systemd, most admins I've worked with would like nothing to change in >>> the >>> middle of a stable release unless it fixes a bug >> >> most admins will not be NOW at F15, they wait until F14-EOL for >> production use to get most bad behavior and bugs away before >> update servers > > Fedora? Production? I do that, but I'm mental yes - from F9 to F14 this was really easy VMware-Cluster with snapshots, some backup-machines as test all machines using the same internal cache-repo and no external per server 4-6 minutes and 30 seconds for reboot no problem maintain 23 servers this way with a little brain and helper-scripts but F15 is the first release where this feels really ugly with no benefit anywhere until now
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
