On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:14:27 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote: > > If you're volunteering to fix and/or paper over all the spurious > > warnings gcc and glibc introduce with every phase of the moon, then > > sure. > > Yes, I do it for my component, GDB has -Werror default in development phases > upstream. It cleans up the code, it finds various minor bugs etc. I didn't say "for your component". > > Otherwise -Werror would essentially mean never shipping anything > > ever again. > > So the maintainers either care about the warnings - and then they should use > -Werror - or they do not care about the warnings - and then it does not matter > regarding warning messages which and how many of them can be found on the Koji > server in the log files. Please decide. I wasn't arguing for or against finding warnings. I was commenting on the ability to see build failures. Admittedly, you were initially responding to Colin, not myself. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
