Re: Btrfs status for F16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/08/2011 07:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>>  Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
>>>> RAID-5 on btrfs  as well if you don't mind?
>>>
>>> It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
>>> for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind specifically but I
>>> imagine that stuff will land in 3.2 to get plenty of testing, and then
>>> the RAID5 stuff will follow.  Or both could land in 3.2, I'm not
>>> entirely sure.  Thanks,
>>
>> it seems obvious that a lots of people waiting for btrfs. may be it'd
>> useful to create some kind of roadmap, missing features, planed kernel
>> release etc..
>> it's clear that one of the zfs biggest feature is the raid and fs layer
>> merge. how does it planed in btrfs etc...
> 
> You mean like this one on the btrfs home page?
> 
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page

something better. there is no roadmap, who is responsible for what which
is the planed kernel version, how do you plane raid-5/6 integration etc...

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux