On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Farkas Levente <lfarkas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote: >>>>>> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are >>>>>> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a >>>>>> slow going process. With your help we will be in a better situation >>>>>> for F17. Thanks, >>>>> >>> >>> Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of >>> RAID-5 on btrfs as well if you don't mind? >> >> It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated >> for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind specifically but I >> imagine that stuff will land in 3.2 to get plenty of testing, and then >> the RAID5 stuff will follow. Or both could land in 3.2, I'm not >> entirely sure. Thanks, > > it seems obvious that a lots of people waiting for btrfs. may be it'd > useful to create some kind of roadmap, missing features, planed kernel > release etc.. > it's clear that one of the zfs biggest feature is the raid and fs layer > merge. how does it planed in btrfs etc... You mean like this one on the btrfs home page? https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
