Re: systemd vice SysV/LSB init systems - what next ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:53 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:

>         I'd suggest something along the lines of 'sorry, but
>         maintaining two
>         officially-supported init systems side-by-side is an excessive
>         burden on
>         package maintainers and quality assurance, so we won't be
>         doing it'.
>         It's hard to go wrong by just politely saying what you mean.
> 
> But as someone who is maintaining his own package...
> 
> Won't I have to maintain two different init system support files
> for both systemd based distros and "all the other Linux and Unix
> distros"
> I also run on?

Well, yes. But when I say 'maintainer' I'm talking about Fedora project
package maintainers, not upstream developers.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
http://www.happyassassin.net


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux