On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > My suggestion is that you keep both init systems, SysV/LSB and systemd, > > > > as separate offerings out of many, and forever so. > > > > > > We'll take that under advisement. > > > > Ajax, > > That remark is also unnecessary and just comes across as snarky. The > > only thing this will achieve is to keep other people from being willing > > to comment on issues in the future. > > So, the preference is to say nothing at all? I'd suggest something along the lines of 'sorry, but maintaining two officially-supported init systems side-by-side is an excessive burden on package maintainers and quality assurance, so we won't be doing it'. It's hard to go wrong by just politely saying what you mean. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
