On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But as someone who is maintaining his own package...
Won't I have to maintain two different init system support files
for both systemd based distros and "all the other Linux and Unix distros"
I also run on?
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > > > My suggestion is that you keep both init systems, SysV/LSB and systemd,
> > > > as separate offerings out of many, and forever so.
> > >
> > > We'll take that under advisement.
> >
> > Ajax,
> > That remark is also unnecessary and just comes across as snarky. The
> > only thing this will achieve is to keep other people from being willing
> > to comment on issues in the future.
>
> So, the preference is to say nothing at all?
I'd suggest something along the lines of 'sorry, but maintaining two
officially-supported init systems side-by-side is an excessive burden on
package maintainers and quality assurance, so we won't be doing it'.
It's hard to go wrong by just politely saying what you mean.
But as someone who is maintaining his own package...
Won't I have to maintain two different init system support files
for both systemd based distros and "all the other Linux and Unix distros"
I also run on?
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
