On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 15:41 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:35:36PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > Le Mar 19 juillet 2011 14:14, Petr Sabata a écrit : > > > > > In case you would to use a different governor and/or specific frequency, try > > > the > > > new cpupower.service (provieded by cpupowerutils). Most people shouldn't need > > > this, though. > > > > Will cpupowerutils obsolete cpufreq so old deployments of cpufreq can be > > garbage-collected ? (yes most people will not need it, but is it not better to > > have something current installed rather than cpufreq living on forever? I'm > > thinking of eternal yum-updated systems here) > > It's not the case at the moment. > > I was thinking about it before and didn't really like it. But it's > just a matter of taste and having yet another Obsoletes/Provides pair in > cpupowerutils.spec won't hurt. If you're orphaning the package I'd say it isn't really a 'matter of taste'. Leaving unmaintained packages lying around on people's systems is poor form, and usually a few releases later some dependency issue arises with the orphaned package that would have been avoided if it had been obsoleted. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
