Re: systemd vice SysV/LSB init systems - what next ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 11:37 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Stijn Hoop <stijn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In other words, why should the package tomcat6 not provide a
> > better /usr/bin/tomcat6 "binary" (or shell script, or whatever) that
> > can work out on its own whether to multi-instantiate?
> 
> 
> In this case the executable in question is in fact a bash script that
> appears to be a distro-specific enhancement...but an upstream
> deliverable.

Yes tomcat has several layers of stuff that grew over time and try to
integrate the java code in the system as a normal service (heretical
wish) 

> So it definitely appears as if the distro maintainer for this package
> have the leeway to move the functions into the "wrapper" executable
> script instead of letting them linger in the init "config"

All this code is here just to instanciate the service and do the related
housekeeping. It does not belong in a separate script any more or less
than the rest of the sysv stuff. That example just shows the sysv setup
was flexible enough to handle complex multi-instanciated setups and
systemd so far isn't

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux