On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:06:03 +0200 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 18:30 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a > écrit : > > > Hum best is to provide you with example which daemon do you > > maintain I can convert it for you and provide it to you as an > > example anyway here's an example of a systemd unit that I converted > > sometime ago for a know application named tomcat6 and I'll leave > > readers to be the judge of that what is harder to understand the > > native systemd unit or the legacy sysv init script... > > > > First the converted unit file > > > Now the legacy sysv init script that everybody seem to love and > > cheerish so much... > > I don't think anyone loves this particular sysv script but you > realize I hope that 99% of its complexity is here to make > multi-instanciation trivial (because when every user can run an IDE > like eclipse that wants its own tomcat instance to play with you *do* > need multi-instanciation) and your unit file does not support this > use case at all? > I think the question is: why should this particular usecase be covered by the SYSTEM init script? In other words, why should the package tomcat6 not provide a better /usr/bin/tomcat6 "binary" (or shell script, or whatever) that can work out on its own whether to multi-instantiate? --Stijn -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
