On 07/19/2011 07:06 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 18:30 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a > écrit : > >> Hum best is to provide you with example which daemon do you maintain I >> can convert it for you and provide it to you as an example anyway here's >> an example of a systemd unit that I converted sometime ago for a know >> application named tomcat6 and I'll leave readers to be the judge of that >> what is harder to understand the native systemd unit or the legacy sysv >> init script... >> >> First the converted unit file >> Now the legacy sysv init script that everybody seem to love and cheerish >> so much... > I don't think anyone loves this particular sysv script but you realize I > hope that 99% of its complexity is here to make multi-instanciation > trivial (because when every user can run an IDE like eclipse that wants > its own tomcat instance to play with you *do* need multi-instanciation) > and your unit file does not support this use case at all? > My unit file is just stripped version of what's happening in the basis once I hear from the maintainers what the desired behaviour I can work with them to complete the progress. The bug that contains that very unit file along with a patch that makes tomcat6 work out of the box has not been touch by the maintainers since the day I filed it which was 2011-07-06 Not that it actually matters there a plenty of already converted and shipped units out there that can show the difference of native systemd units and script messes JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
