Kay Sievers (kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx) said: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 23:27, David Michael <fedora.dm0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Right, but that then causes 'last one wins' behavior among multiple DMs. > >> > >> I suppose we could use alternatives for this, as much as I dislike it. > > > > I meant creating that symlink was the replacement for > > /etc/sysconfig/desktop, the end-user configuration. > > Yes, this link will replace the config file. > > > As for what packages do about their DM service files, I would agree > > with letting alternatives manage a default > > /lib/systemd/system/display-manager.service symlink, > > We should not let packages create config files in lib, lib is more for > static content from rpms, not really for configuration. For the same > reason, 'systemctl enable/disable' acts on /etc only. It's not a config file, it's the default service. I mean, we could manage the one in /etc instead, but I don't know that that's that much better. You could make the argument that the symlink in /lib is the system maintained software, and therefore is the proper one. Honestly, I'd prefer that 'systemctl enable', when called from spec files, enable under /lib to better define what the system defaults are. Of course, that might be better handled with the preset code. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
