On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > 2011/7/18 Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig > > > > > > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html > > > > > > > Generally speaking I like the idea of dropping /etc/sysconfig. I think > > the right way it keeping minimal, standardized configuration in > > /etc/services.conf/ or something like that. > > No. There is no need for a directory that replaces /etc/sysconfig. It's > borked. If a daemon has not configuration file but should have one, then > fix the daemon, don't fake a configuration file. Some daemons cannot be "fixed", get over with this mantra that daemons need be fixed Lennart. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
