Hi, On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should not let packages create config files in lib, lib is more for > static content from rpms, not really for configuration. For the same > reason, 'systemctl enable/disable' acts on /etc only. I had imagined using alternatives would allow the symlink /lib/systemd/system/display-manager.service to be provided by systemd-units (as it is now), just pointed at /etc/alternatives instead of prefdm.service. > The link in etc would need to be managed by alternatives, but I'm not > sure, if it's really necessary. In order to do that, wouldn't an RPM have to own the service link in /etc? I was under the impression that packages weren't supposed to own anything under /etc/systemd/system. Regardless, I think I'm off-topic from the rest of the thread, so I will leave these details alone for the time being. David -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
