Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:50 AM, JB <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> wrote: > > I have difficulty swallowing the fact that there are so many Red Hat, Oracle, > > and other famous technology names involved (officially or dev's private > > contributions) in development of BTRFS, and at the same time they practice > > such loosely approach to software development methodology. > > Rather than vague accusations, can you provide some concrete problem? > > You're badmouthing the work of some rather experienced and respected > people, yet you have provided no specifics whatsoever. > > m Well, then you have to read the thread more carefully before you bark back - right in the first OP's post you have references, e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/18/144 Here is one more: http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/linux-a-unix/6-linux-filesystems-benchmarked-ext3-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-btrfs.html They all confirm the same picture ! Enjoy it. JB -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
