On 07/10/2011 07:31 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> Let's just aggree on disagreeing about this approach anyway the last
> unit file I submitted does what Steve and you and perhaps many others
> want's it to do afaik...
>
To be clear - I have as yet no views on systemd unit files et al here
- just saying its healthy to keep things coherent. So my comment is
limited to your specific suggestion of breaking things apart.
In fact I'd prefer a world where every app config file belonged
directly with the app and not elsewhere - for one thing this supports
having multiple versions of apps whereas if there is a single config
(/etc/app.conf) this does not cleanly support multiple app versions.
Compare with:
/usr/lib/app-v1/
etc/app.conf
bin/app
... etc
/usr/lib/app-v2/app.conf
etc/app.conf
and one can eve make a default versions via soft links much as the
alternates scheme does:
/etc/app.conf -> /usr/lib/app-v1/etc/app.conf
etc
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
