Re: Calling autoconf in a spec.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius writes:

> I've got C++ code that's more than ten years old. Still builds just
> fine, without any diagnostics.
Then you're lucky - May-be your C++ code is recent enough?

No. I have the source tree right here. Large chunks of it are quite old.


So far, most pre-ISO-C++ code I have encountered, esp. when originating
from non-gnu platforms has required major surgery ;)

Worse, "advanced c++ code" often even requires surgery between g++
releases (Much of my own works is based on C++) ;)

It's been my experience that each successive g++ release is more strict and paranoid on compliance. It'll will complain about stuff that was not kosher to start with, but previous g++ releases let it fly.


Attachment: pgpXkjASEOgXC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux