On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:31:18AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > Thanks all for the input. I didn't realize the subject was *this* > controversial. I did find the other discussion thread[1] which was aimed > at completing the draft I had linked to, and as you'll notice it was > inconclusive. I was hoping something had changed (the thread dates back > to 2008). > > I do believe in patching configure.in, and Makefile.am and the rest, but > this package seems a little out of my scope which is why I was thinking > of running autoreconf in the spec. > Running autoreconf in the spec is fine. Running autoreconf manually and producing a patch based on that output is also fine. The question hasn't come before the fpc in a while (and we have different members now) but the draft you linked to did not have the votes to pass the last time it came up. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpZhMze73YtB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
