On 06/30/2011 07:37 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak<jmoskovc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just >>> the rawhide.. >> >> >> Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient >> instructions on how to revert the libreport packages from F15 updates >> testing so that the packages that require report-gtk will work >> properly again. >> >> I'm not pointing fingers. I just want to know, from you, the package >> maintainer, how to back out of the semi brokenness introduced by the >> malformed obsoletes in the updates-testing package that is now a dead >> end if >> this isn't going to firm up as an official update. >> >> > > Am I misremembering? I recall an official update which broke sealert - > the libreport fix from updates testing never installed as it was broken > and never was pushed stable. > > So now F15 stock with official stable updates only, has a broken > sealert (maybe other things). > > Whats the way forward from here in F15? > > gene/ > 1. bumping the version of the report-gtk package should do the trick - I already contacted the maintainer and ask him to do - as this seems to work for rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715373#c55 2. fix the yum so it can handle this situation better 3. last resort would be asking rel-engs to remove the broken libreport from the stable repositories (if it's even possible) J. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
