Re: [HEADS-UP] replacing report with libreport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
>> the rawhide..
> 
> 
> Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
> instructions on how to revert the libreport packages from F15 updates
> testing so that the packages that require report-gtk will work
> properly again.
> 
> I'm not pointing fingers. I just want to know, from you, the package
> maintainer, how to back out of the semi brokenness introduced by the
> malformed obsoletes in the updates-testing package that is now a dead
> end if
> this isn't going to firm up as an official update.
> 
> 

  Am I misremembering? I recall an official update which broke sealert -
the libreport fix from updates testing never installed as it was broken
and never was pushed stable.

  So now F15 stock with official stable updates only, has a  broken
sealert (maybe other things).

  Whats the way forward from here in F15?

  gene/

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux