> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> Le Lun 27 juin 2011 15:12, Miloslav TrmaÄ? a écrit : >> >> > Placing trust in the manufacturer of the hardware puts the user in no >> > worse position than they were before. >> >> I don't call placing absolute vetting power in bios writer hands "no >> worse >> position". I don't thing anyone can point to a "good" bios on real world >> hardware. > > I appreciate the disdain - no, really, trust me, I do - but you should > realize that SMM means you already may have no control over the machine. Honestly what I think it comes down to in the end, for me, is information. We need to see more information in the Feature Request before this should even have a shot, as the flurry of questions shows. Additionally, if the information presented then clearly explains the situation, and all source code is available and it meets our guidlines, then we're probably better off with the technology available in Fedora than not. Vendors and RHEL customers will likely want it at some point, so we may as well have it in Fedora so that we can learn how to use it and how to counteract it if need be. Of course, if more information shows there to be signifigant conflict with our guidlines, then it's moot. -J > - ajax > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
