W dniu 25.06.2011 23:43, Adam Williamson pisze: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 22:06 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> W dniu 25.06.2011 18:58, Adam Williamson pisze: >>> On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:56 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local >>>> rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs: >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636 >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572 >>>> I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit >>>> access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me. >>> >>> Well, it's fairer to assume the maintainer is simply busy and hasn't got >>> to the bug yet than to assume they're ignoring you. >>> >>> Note that your patch isn't the best fix; it would be better to use the >>> --disable-rpath configure parameter. I meant to push a build this week >>> which would fix this but didn't get around to it yet... >> >> My patch is not the best fix, true. The problem is that --disable-rpath >> does not work as advertised and using the sed command from the Fedora >> wiki prevents cheese from building at all. It is all written down in the >> bug. > > Last I read, --disable-rpath worked if you did an autoreconf too? That > would still be the most preferable option, I believe... I just checked again. - autoreconf does not seem to make a difference - ./autogen.sh is enough to remove rpaths, --disable-rpath is not needed anymore. If running ./autogen.sh is preferred to chrpath, then I think this should be documented in the wiki. I had exactly the same issue with gnome-chemistry-utils long time ago and I ended up using chrpath. Julian -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
