On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:46:46 -0300 Evandro Giovanini <efgiovanini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em Sex, 2011-06-17 às 15:21 -0400, Bernd Stramm escreveu: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:47:38 -0400 > > Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:32:12PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote: > > > > So Gnome Shell is not for a good many of the people who had been > > > > using Gnome before that. > > > > > > > > > > YES! I don't know why more people don't realize this: GNOME 2 was > > > a mediocre interface for a lot of people. It COULD NOT be a good > > > interface for the same number of people, and there is NOTHING > > > wrong with them pruning their userbase to a subset which they can > > > adequately serve. > > > > > > > It is not good to counter a technical point with a personal > > > > attack, which is what you did. > > > > > > > > > > No I didn't. > > > > Sure looked like you did. Perhaps it not done with malice, let's go > > with that version. > > > > I think you must be confused. The only personal attack post in this > thread: > "One could do that, but that would be an idiotic thing to do. So one > doesn't." > was posted by yourself. My objection was just to this line: > One could rephrase your complaint as "I don't want to focus on my> current task." which in my view questions my work ethic. I find that to be derogatory, and I actually do think it is a stupid statement. Perhaps "idiotic" is a bit harsh. -- Bernd Stramm bernd.stramm@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
