On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:16:46 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:02, Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:05:08PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote: > >> > >> I think it fails on #1: > >> > >> > Makes it easy for users to focus on their current task and > >> > reduces distraction and interruption > >> > >> First, this point assumes that there is *one* current task. That > >> is not how I work. I have one main task, and I keep an eye on some > >> other things, like whose is in some chats, what comes up in > >> twitter flows, etc. > >> > > > > One could rephrase your complaint as "I don't want to focus on my > > current task." So GNOME shell just isn't for you. > > Cold. Can we just call this conversation closed before it gets any > colder? > > Gnome Shell is not for various people for various reasons. For those > people there are other desktop environments. The End. So I make a point. Someone follows that up in a style that is not preferred by many people. The consequence is that my point should not be adressed ? We all have to be quiet about it? My main point is that the full-screen menu causes a serious interruption of work flow, and that this in contradiction with the first point of GnomeShell's list of goals. > > > -- Bernd Stramm bernd.stramm@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel