On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 07:58 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > On 06/13/2011 03:08 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > > Having a quick look at the link and at the steps to reproduce the bug > > > gave me shivers. Are we really sure that systemd is ready? I mean, I > > > don't even call my code "alpha" if it can't parse a slash correctly. > > How is it systemd's fault that the user's fstab is invalid? > > > > Kevin Kofler > > > Maybe Fedora should adhere to Linus's rule that we don't have > regressions that break users stuff. This is impossible. Every piece of software has bugs, hence every piece of software also has regressions. Some of these 'break user stuff'. You can't write categorical rules like this, because all software has bugs. All you can do is set appropriate policies for prioritizing how you fix those bugs. Significant regressions are generally fixed at quite a high priority in Fedora, and that is the case here: the bug in question was addressed quickly after it was reported. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
