Re: libgcal new owner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In data 16/6/2011 14:46:59, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> I don't think that's required, just take ownership, and update as
> normal.
> 
> I see you've done that, but you missed "Fedora Devel" too.
> 
> -- Rex

I take the ownership for "Fedora devel" now.
Whatever I open a new review request for my spec file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713741

There was an inconsistency  between spec file on fedora git repo scm master 
branch and spec file in src fedora 14...
Than I remove some line in the spec file so I prefer a new review because 
I'm new in fedora packager mantainer. So I follow these guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages

I hope anybody can take a quickly review.

Thank you very much!
-- 
Mario Santagiuliana
www.marionline.it

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux